1. If you need permissions to any boards (explicit, Siam, global village, etc) that you have access to on the old site, but can't access drop me (MrJunkpile) a note and I'll add it for you. For any archived threads you would like reopened, let me know and if they show potential to still be relevant; I'll open them.

Blog I Don't Get Homosexuality

Discussion in 'Virtual Ink' started by BoboTheClown, Feb 16, 2012.

  1. BoboTheClown Guest

    probably cos i'm not gay. but that's not my pt. i don't get the gay drive. the human body is designed for men to penetrate women. that's how the organs fit. we're literally fitted to each other. as a man, being with another man seems pretty gross. beyond homophobia, though, it makes sense for me to find it gross, cos like i said, 2 men don't fit together any more than 2 women do. hell a guy and a female goat make a better Lego match than 2 men do, so i say i should be grossed out by it.

    this makes me wonder, though, how i'd feel about "incorrect" sex if i was gay. i mean, how hard would it be for me to sleep with a woman? i wouldn't want to cos she wouldn't be a man. but since my body fits in hers, would this make a difference? i mean, it'd have to be easier to stomach banging the "wrong" sex when anatomically it's the "right" one, right? this makes this homosexuality thing kinda confusing.

    this question gets very practical, too, cos it asks another important question. how hard is it for a gay man to fake being straight? the answer to this question affects how i feel about gay marriage, cos if it's easy to fake, and gay men can mate with ladies and have familes in a way that goes with how our bodies were laid out, i'd be against gay marriage. all it would do is validate being gay, which wouldn't be necessary.

    if, on the other hand, gay men fail at faking the straight life more often then not, or at least enough to make trying dangerous, gay marriage would prevent this failure and i'd support it cos it would make sense to have an institution that saved marriages.

    if we're all set up to be hetero, i don't want young people who aren't sure for whatever reason given the green light to go a direction they didn't have to go, so it's important for me to know whether tomorrow's families are at risk making these kids go straight.
    M likes this.
  2. AL1CE Hexy Witch

    Sex is not like this:
    [IMG]

    In terms of "fitting" surely there isn't that much difference between one hole and the other. Of course to know for sure you'd have to put your dick in an ass.
    M likes this.
  3. BoboTheClown Guest

    butt sex does not lead to more little humans
    M likes this.
  4. AL1CE Hexy Witch

    And? I don't see what that has to do with it "fitting". Surely in some ways that makes butt sex less disturbing than regular sex.
    M likes this.
  5. freezerburn Active Member

    Neither does a blow job, but a lot of people enjoy it.
    M and MrJunkpile like this.
  6. BoboTheClown Guest

    my pt is, it's clear nature intended it one way. homosexuality goes against that. i'm not saying being gay is bad, just that it goes against the anatomical design of humans. we can eat with our feet but our hands were meant for it.
    M likes this.
  7. BoboTheClown Guest

    didn't say anything about enjoyment. i'm talking about the anatomical design of humans.
    M likes this.
  8. AL1CE Hexy Witch

    Humans (especially male ones) are anatomically designed to enjoy having cock shaped objects in their ass.
  9. BoboTheClown Guest

    ejaculation is designed to fertilize eggs, not drip out of an ass
  10. AL1CE Hexy Witch

    Are you saying gay sex is ok if you don't cum?
  11. AL1CE Hexy Witch

    Also are you saying that guys shouldn't masturbate?
    M likes this.
  12. BoboTheClown Guest

    i'm saying straight sex leads to procreation and no form of sex between gays does...not naturally anyway
    M likes this.
  13. AL1CE Hexy Witch

    M likes this.
  14. freezerburn Active Member

    Not all female/male partners can procreate either. Designed that way or not it simply doesn't happen 100% of the time. Natures way of population control?
    M likes this.
  15. BoboTheClown Guest

    well sure, if the parts don't work, then they don't work. some engines don't run. but clearly a car is meant to be driven and a cart is meant to be pushed. things are designed based on how they're supposed to be used.

    a woman's vagina is supposed to receive ejaculates, not her ass. i don't think this is debatable.
    M likes this.
  16. NOS Radministrator

    is this a hate thread??
    M, freezerburn and AL1CE like this.
  17. AL1CE Hexy Witch

    Why does everything have to be used for what it was designed for and only for what it was designed for?
  18. freezerburn Active Member

    If your goal is to procreate naturally, sure.
    But, that's not always the goal.
    M likes this.
  19. BoboTheClown Guest

    it doesn't. as i said, if gays can't fake being straight effectively and the bad outweighs the good of them trying, then i'm all for supporting gay marriage. i just think all efforts should be made to use body parts properly.
    M likes this.
  20. BoboTheClown Guest

    well, i'm for using body parts as nature intended. however, if gays can't fake being straight, and the damage to the nuclear families of those who try is too great, i'm all for gay marriage.
    M likes this.

Share This Page